Subscribe to our Newsletter!
By subscribing to our newsletter, you agree with our privacy terms
Home > IT Monitoring > Storage Running Out Despite Having Free Space? Here’s How to Fix Your Provisioning Strategy
December 05, 2025
You’re staring at your monitoring dashboard in disbelief. Your storage array shows plenty of available capacity, but virtual machines are crashing. The alerts are flooding in. Multiple VMs just went down simultaneously, and your phone is ringing off the hook.
This is the nightmare scenario that happens when thin provisioning goes wrong.
Systems engineers and IT infrastructure managers face this problem constantly. You provision storage for your VMware environment thinking you’re being efficient. You allocate virtual disks using thin provisioning because it seems smart—why waste storage space on unused capacity? But then reality hits. Your thin-provisioned datastore fills up faster than your monitoring can catch it, and suddenly you’re dealing with production outages.
The frustration is real. One Reddit user described it perfectly: “Thin provisioned filled up a LUN. Took a little time to figure out what was happening with multiple VMs down.” By the time you realize what’s happening, the damage is done.
This problem costs organizations thousands in downtime, damages your reputation with stakeholders, and creates unnecessary stress for IT teams. The worst part? It’s completely preventable when you understand how storage provisioning actually works and implement the right strategy for your environment.
The core issue isn’t thin provisioning itself—it’s the mismatch between provisioning strategy and monitoring capabilities. Here’s what actually causes these disasters:
Thin provisioning allows you to allocate more virtual disk space than you have physical storage. This is called over-provisioning, and it’s both a feature and a trap. You can create ten 100GB virtual disks on a 500GB datastore because thin provisioning only consumes space as data is written.
This works beautifully until all those VMs start actually using their allocated space. Without aggressive monitoring, you don’t see the problem until the datastore hits 100% capacity and everything crashes.
Many administrators don’t realize that both thin provisioning and thick lazy zeroed provisioning behave similarly during operation. The difference is in upfront allocation, not runtime behavior. This misconception leads to poor decision-making about which provisioning method to use for specific workloads.
Modern storage arrays from vendors like Pure Storage, Nimble, and EMC often recommend thin provisioning at the VM level because they handle space allocation intelligently at the storage layer. But if you’re running on internal disks or older storage systems, following this advice without understanding your infrastructure can lead to disasters.
As one Reddit user noted: “Most manufacturers want the VMs provisioned as thin nowadays… I prefer the VM side to be thick unless you’re running on internal disk.” This conflict between vendor best practices and real-world infrastructure creates confusion.
Snapshots consume additional storage regardless of your provisioning type. Many administrators forget to account for snapshot growth when calculating datastore capacity, leading to unexpected space exhaustion even with seemingly adequate monitoring.
The solution isn’t abandoning thin provisioning—it’s implementing a workload-based provisioning strategy with proper monitoring. Here’s your step-by-step approach to fixing this problem permanently.
Time required: 2-4 hoursWhat you’ll need: Access to vCenter, storage monitoring tools, spreadsheet for documentation
Start by documenting every virtual machine in your environment. Create a spreadsheet with these columns:
Use your VMware vSphere interface to check provisioning types. Navigate to each VM’s settings and examine the virtual disk configuration. The VMDK file properties will show whether it’s thin or thick provisioned.
Why this step matters: You can’t fix what you don’t understand. This audit reveals patterns—you might discover that critical production databases are thin provisioned while development VMs are thick provisioned, which is backwards.
Common mistake: Skipping this audit and making blanket changes. Don’t convert everything to one provisioning type without understanding your actual needs.
Time required: 1-2 hoursWhat you’ll need: Your audit spreadsheet, input from application owners
Divide your VMs into three categories:
Category A – Critical Production (Use Thick Provisioning):
Category B – Standard Production (Use Thin with Aggressive Monitoring):
Category C – Non-Critical (Use Thin Provisioning):
This categorization gives you a clear decision framework. When someone asks “should this be thin or thick?” you have objective criteria instead of guessing.
Time required: 4-8 hours for initial setupWhat you’ll need: Storage monitoring tools, alert configuration access
This is the most critical step. Thin provisioning only works safely with aggressive monitoring. Set up monitoring for:
Datastore capacity alerts:
VM storage growth rate:
Storage I/O performance:
Use virtual machine monitoring tools that provide visibility into both the hypervisor and guest OS storage consumption. This dual-layer monitoring catches problems before they become disasters.
Why this step matters: Monitoring is your safety net. With proper alerts, you’ll know about capacity issues days or weeks before they cause outages, giving you time to add storage or clean up unnecessary data.
Common mistake: Setting alerts too high (like 95% capacity). By the time you get alerted, you’re already in crisis mode with limited options.
Time required: Varies by VM size (plan for maintenance windows)What you’ll need: Sufficient datastore space, VMware Storage vMotion capability
Now execute your provisioning strategy based on your workload categories:
Converting from thin to thick:
Converting from thick to thin:
For VMware environments: Right-click the VM → Migrate → Change storage only → Select destination datastore → Choose provisioning format → Complete migration.
Why this step matters: Aligning provisioning type with workload criticality prevents both over-provisioning disasters and wasted storage capacity.
Common mistake: Converting everything at once. Start with non-critical VMs to gain confidence, then move to production systems during planned maintenance.
Time required: 2-3 hoursWhat you’ll need: Documentation platform, stakeholder contact list
Create a formal provisioning policy document that includes:
Share this with your storage team, virtualization team, and application owners. Make sure everyone understands why you’re using specific provisioning types for different workloads.
Why this step matters: Without documentation, the next person provisioning a VM will make arbitrary decisions, undoing all your work. Clear policies prevent future problems.
Not every environment fits the standard thin-for-dev, thick-for-production model. Here are alternative approaches for specific scenarios:
If you’re running on all-flash storage from vendors like Pure Storage or Nimble, you might use thin provisioning everywhere. These arrays handle space allocation so efficiently that the performance difference between thin and thick becomes negligible.
When to use this approach: Modern all-flash arrays with built-in deduplication and compressionPros: Maximum storage efficiency, simplified managementCons: Requires premium storage hardware, still needs aggressive monitoring
Use thick provisioning on high-performance SSD datastores for critical workloads, and thin provisioning on lower-tier spinning disk storage for everything else.
When to use this approach: Mixed storage infrastructure with performance tiersPros: Balances performance and efficiency, clear separation of workload typesCons: More complex to manage, requires careful VM placement
Provision all VMs as thick at the VMware level, but use thin provisioning at the storage array level. This gives you the predictability of thick provisioning from VMware’s perspective while maintaining storage efficiency at the array.
When to use this approach: Enterprise storage arrays with advanced featuresPros: Best of both worlds, eliminates over-provisioning risk at VM levelCons: Requires enterprise storage hardware, monitoring needed at array level
Fixing your current provisioning strategy is only half the battle. Here’s how to prevent these problems from recurring:
Review storage consumption trends monthly. Track growth rates for each datastore and project when you’ll need additional capacity. Don’t wait until you’re at 70% capacity to start procurement—lead times for storage hardware can be weeks or months.
Create a capacity planning spreadsheet that tracks:
Set up automated processes to identify and remove:
Use PowerCLI scripts to generate weekly reports of these items and send them to VM owners for review.
Every new VM should go through a standardized provisioning process:
Make sure everyone who provisions VMs understands:
A 30-minute training session can prevent thousands in downtime costs.
Capacity monitoring catches space exhaustion, but performance monitoring catches the early warning signs. If you see increasing latency on a datastore, investigate before it becomes a capacity crisis.
Implement comprehensive server monitoring that tracks both storage capacity and performance metrics across your entire virtualization platform.
The thin vs thick provisioning problem isn’t a technical limitation—it’s a management challenge. With the right strategy, monitoring, and processes, you can safely use thin provisioning where it makes sense while protecting critical workloads with thick provisioning.
Your five-step solution gives you everything you need:
The expected results: No more surprise storage outages. Predictable performance for critical workloads. Maximum storage efficiency for non-critical systems. Clear decision-making framework for future VM provisioning.
Your next steps: Start with the audit this week. You can complete it in a few hours, and it gives you the foundation for everything else. Then tackle monitoring setup—this is your safety net that prevents disasters.
Remember, the goal isn’t to choose thin or thick provisioning universally. The goal is to match the right provisioning method to each workload’s requirements while maintaining visibility into your entire storage infrastructure.
Ready to optimize your storage strategy? Start with your audit today, and you’ll have a robust provisioning policy in place within two weeks.
Previous
Thin vs Thick Provisioning: Choose the Right Storage Strategy for Your VMware Environment
Next
7 Critical Differences Between Thin and Thick Provisioning Every VMware Admin Must Know