Subscribe to our Newsletter!
By subscribing to our newsletter, you agree with our privacy terms
Home > IT Monitoring > How a Mid-Size Healthcare Provider Saved $340K Annually by Integrating ITAM and ITSM
December 18, 2025
TechHealth Medical Group, a 450-employee healthcare provider operating across five locations, faced mounting IT costs and compliance risks due to disconnected asset management and service delivery processes. Their IT team struggled with duplicate software licenses, slow incident resolution, and failed audit readiness.
The Challenge: Fragmented systems created blind spots in asset visibility, leading to $340,000 in annual waste from unused licenses and inefficient service delivery that averaged 6.5 hours per incident resolution.
The Solution: Implementing integrated ITAM and ITSM processes with automated discovery tools, unified CMDB, and streamlined workflows that connected asset data with service delivery.
Key Results:• $340,000 annual cost savings from license optimization and reduced procurement waste• 73% faster incident resolution (from 6.5 hours to 1.75 hours average)• 98% audit compliance achieved within 8 months• 42% reduction in service desk tickets through better asset visibility• 100% asset discovery accuracy across all five locations
In early 2024, TechHealth Medical Group’s IT Infrastructure Manager, David Chen, faced a crisis. The organization had grown rapidly through acquisitions, but their IT management remained fragmented across multiple systems and spreadsheets.
“We had one system tracking purchases, another for the service desk, and Excel spreadsheets everywhere,” Chen explained. “When users reported issues, our service desk couldn’t quickly identify which assets supported affected services. We were flying blind.”
The specific problems included:
License Compliance NightmareTechHealth discovered they were paying for 680 software licenses but could only account for 420 active installations. Finance couldn’t reconcile IT spending, and nobody knew which licenses were actually needed versus which were legacy waste.
Slow Incident ResolutionAverage incident resolution time had ballooned to 6.5 hours because service desk technicians lacked asset information. They couldn’t quickly determine which devices supported critical patient care systems, leading to extended troubleshooting and frustrated clinical staff.
Failed Audit ReadinessA preliminary compliance audit revealed TechHealth couldn’t demonstrate software license compliance or track medical device software updates required by HIPAA regulations. The organization faced potential fines and certification risks.
Duplicate Asset RecordsFinance tracked 1,240 IT assets in their procurement system, while IT’s inventory showed 1,180 devices. The 60-device discrepancy meant “arguing with finance about duplicates and out-of-date records” consumed hours of management time monthly.
No Visibility Across LocationsWith five medical facilities spread across 120 miles, IT teams had no unified view of assets or services. Each location maintained separate records, making centralized management impossible.
TechHealth had tried solving these problems before. In 2022, they implemented a basic ITSM platform for service desk ticketing, but without accurate asset data, it only marginalized the symptoms. In 2023, they attempted manual asset audits, but the data became outdated within weeks as devices moved between locations.
“We were treating symptoms instead of addressing the root cause,” Chen admitted. “We needed integrated ITAM and ITSM, but we didn’t know where to start.”
Chen’s team started with comprehensive asset discovery rather than rushing into ITSM improvements. They recognized that effective service management required accurate asset data as its foundation.
Step 1: Automated Asset DiscoveryTechHealth deployed network monitoring tools with automated discovery capabilities across all five locations. This identified every network-connected device, installed software, and cloud resource within 48 hours.
“The automated discovery found 340 devices we didn’t know existed—mostly old workstations and network equipment that were still consuming licenses and support contracts,” Chen noted.
Step 2: License ReconciliationThe team cross-referenced discovered software installations against procurement records and vendor contracts. This revealed the 260-license gap between what they paid for and what they actually used.
Step 3: Asset Lifecycle DocumentationFor each discovered asset, they documented purchase date, warranty status, assigned user, location, and support contract details. This created the comprehensive asset database that ITAM requires beyond simple inventory.
With accurate asset data established, TechHealth built their Configuration Management Database to support ITSM processes.
Mapping Configuration ItemsThey identified which assets supported critical services like electronic health records (EHR), patient scheduling, and medical imaging. This created the service dependency maps that ITSM incident management requires.
Establishing Data GovernanceThe team defined clear rules: ITAM tools were the source of truth for asset data, which automatically synced to the CMDB every 6 hours. This prevented the duplicate records that had plagued previous efforts.
With ITAM foundations and CMDB integration complete, TechHealth enhanced their ITSM processes to leverage the new asset visibility.
Incident Management TransformationService desk technicians gained instant access to asset information when users reported issues. They could immediately see which devices supported affected services, dramatically speeding troubleshooting.
Change Management Risk ReductionBefore making infrastructure changes, IT teams could now identify all dependent assets and services. This reduced change-related incidents by 67% compared to the previous year.
Automated Service RequestsWith accurate asset inventory, TechHealth implemented self-service portals where users could request software installations. The system automatically checked license availability before approving requests, preventing over-licensing.
Total Implementation: 8 monthsTeam Size: 3 full-time IT staff, 1 part-time project managerExternal Consulting: 40 hours for initial planning and tool selectionBudget: $85,000 (tools, consulting, training)ROI Timeline: 3 months to break even, ongoing $340K annual savings
The integration of ITAM and ITSM delivered results that exceeded TechHealth’s initial projections.
Cost Savings: $340,000 Annually
• $220,000 from license optimization – Eliminated 260 unused software licenses• $75,000 from reduced procurement waste – Stopped buying duplicate assets• $45,000 from extended asset lifecycles – Better maintenance prevented premature replacements
“We discovered we were paying for three different remote desktop solutions when we only needed one,” Chen explained. “That alone saved $68,000 annually.”
Operational Efficiency: 73% Faster Incident Resolution
• Before: 6.5 hours average incident resolution time• After: 1.75 hours average incident resolution time• Impact: Clinical staff experienced 73% less downtime, improving patient care delivery
The improvement came from service desk technicians having immediate access to asset information. “Instead of spending hours identifying which server supported a failing application, we could see it instantly in the CMDB,” noted Sarah Martinez, TechHealth’s Service Desk Manager.
Compliance Achievement: 98% Audit Readiness
• Software license compliance: 98% (up from 62%)• Medical device tracking: 100% (required for HIPAA)• Asset documentation: Complete audit trail for all IT resources
When TechHealth faced their next compliance audit, they passed with zero findings. “The auditors were impressed that we could instantly produce license documentation and asset tracking reports,” Chen said.
Service Quality: 42% Reduction in Tickets
Surprisingly, integrating ITAM and ITSM reduced overall service desk ticket volume by 42%. Better asset visibility enabled proactive maintenance and prevented many incidents before they impacted users.
Multi-Location Visibility: 100% Asset Discovery
Distributed network monitoring across all five locations gave TechHealth unified visibility for the first time. IT teams could manage assets and services centrally while maintaining local support.
Beyond the planned improvements, TechHealth discovered additional advantages:
Improved Vendor NegotiationsAccurate license usage data enabled Chen’s team to negotiate better contracts. “When we could show vendors exactly how many licenses we needed, we got volume discounts we’d never qualified for before,” he noted.
Faster New Employee OnboardingWith clear asset inventory and automated provisioning, new clinical staff received fully configured workstations within 2 hours instead of the previous 2-day wait.
Better Capacity PlanningHistorical asset data revealed usage patterns that informed infrastructure investments. TechHealth avoided a $120,000 server purchase by identifying underutilized existing capacity.
1. Starting with ITAM Foundations“The best decision we made was building accurate asset inventory before enhancing ITSM,” Chen reflected. “Organizations that rush into ITSM without asset data struggle indefinitely.”
2. Automation Over Manual ProcessesAutomated discovery and continuous monitoring kept asset data current without manual effort. “Manual audits become outdated immediately. Automation is the only sustainable approach,” Martinez added.
3. Executive SponsorshipSecuring CFO support was crucial because ITAM involves finance, procurement, and IT. “When finance saw the license waste, they became our biggest advocates,” Chen noted.
4. Phased ImplementationBreaking the project into three phases (ITAM foundation, CMDB integration, ITSM enhancement) made the transformation manageable and allowed the team to demonstrate value incrementally.
5. Clear Data GovernanceEstablishing which system owned which data prevented the duplicate records that had plagued previous efforts.
Start Sooner“We wasted two years trying to fix ITSM without addressing the underlying asset data problems,” Chen admitted. “We should have recognized that ITAM had to come first.”
Invest in Better TrainingInitial user adoption was slow because staff didn’t understand the new workflows. More comprehensive training upfront would have accelerated benefits realization.
Include More Stakeholders EarlierBringing procurement and finance into planning earlier would have prevented some workflow conflicts that emerged during implementation.
“Don’t confuse asset inventory with asset management,” Chen emphasized. “True ITAM includes financial tracking, contract management, and lifecycle planning—not just maintaining a device list.”
“Integration is non-negotiable.” Organizations trying to run ITAM and ITSM separately will struggle with the same problems TechHealth faced. The disciplines work better together.
“Automate everything possible.” Manual processes can’t keep pace with modern IT environments. Tools like PRTG Network Monitor that automatically discover and track assets are essential.
Step 1: Audit Your Current State (Week 1-2)Document what asset data you have, where it lives, and how accurate it is. Identify gaps between finance records and IT inventory.
Step 2: Implement Automated Discovery (Week 3-4)Deploy monitoring tools that automatically discover and track IT assets across your environment.
Step 3: Build ITAM Foundation (Month 2-3)Reconcile licenses, document asset lifecycles, and establish financial tracking. This creates the foundation ITSM needs.
Step 4: Integrate CMDB (Month 4-5)Map how assets support services, establish data governance, and connect ITAM data to your ITSM platform.
Step 5: Enhance ITSM Processes (Month 6-8)Leverage integrated asset data to improve incident management, change management, and service requests.
• Tools: Asset discovery and monitoring platform, ITSM platform with CMDB, integration middleware• Team: 2-3 IT staff, project manager, executive sponsor• Budget: $50,000-$150,000 depending on organization size• Timeline: 6-8 months for complete implementation
Based on TechHealth’s experience and industry benchmarks:
• Cost savings: 15-25% of annual IT spending through license optimization• Incident resolution: 50-75% improvement in average resolution time• Compliance: 95%+ audit readiness within 6-8 months• ROI: Break even within 3-6 months, ongoing annual savings
Ready to start your ITAM and ITSM integration journey? Begin with automated asset discovery using tools like comprehensive IT monitoring solutions that provide the visibility both disciplines require.
Previous
7 Critical Differences Between ITAM and ITSM Every IT Manager Should Know
Next
I Learned the Hard Way: Why You Need Both ITAM and ITSM (Not Just One)