Can’t Figure Out What’s Eating Your Bandwidth? Here’s How to Fix It

Netflow vs SNMP
Cristina De Luca -

December 12, 2025

The Problem

You’re staring at your network monitoring dashboard, and the alerts are screaming. Your internet circuit is maxed out at 98% utilization. Users are complaining about slow applications. Video conferences are freezing. But here’s the frustrating part: your SNMP monitoring tells you that there’s a problem, but it can’t tell you why.

This is one of the most common—and most frustrating—problems network administrators face. You know bandwidth is being consumed, but you have no idea by whom, by what application, or why it’s happening right now. You’re left guessing, blocking random traffic to see what helps, or worse, just upgrading bandwidth without understanding if that will actually solve the problem.

If you’ve ever spent hours troubleshooting a bandwidth issue only to discover it was caused by something completely unexpected (like that one user running an unauthorized cloud backup), you know exactly how costly this problem can be. The average network administrator spends 3-5 hours per week troubleshooting bandwidth issues that could be diagnosed in minutes with the right approach.

Who experiences this: Network administrators, IT managers, and anyone responsible for network performance who relies solely on SNMP monitoring without traffic flow analysis.

Why it’s frustrating: SNMP shows you the symptoms (high utilization) but not the cause (which applications, users, or destinations). It’s like a doctor telling you that you have a fever without being able to diagnose the underlying illness.

What causes it: The root cause is a visibility gap. SNMP polls devices for interface statistics—bytes in, bytes out, utilization percentage—but it doesn’t capture information about individual traffic flows. You can see the total bandwidth consumption, but you can’t see the breakdown of what’s consuming it.

Why This Happens

Understanding why SNMP alone can’t solve bandwidth analysis problems helps you appreciate why the solution works.

SNMP Was Designed for Device Health, Not Traffic Analysis

SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) was created to monitor device health—CPU, memory, interface status, and aggregate traffic counters. It polls devices at regular intervals (typically every 1-5 minutes) and collects summary statistics. It’s excellent at telling you where problems exist (which interface, which device), but it has no mechanism to tell you what traffic is causing those problems.

Think of SNMP as a speedometer in your car. It tells you how fast you’re going, but it doesn’t tell you why you’re going that speed or what’s causing you to accelerate.

Common Misconceptions

Many administrators believe that adding more SNMP monitoring will solve visibility problems. They add more metrics, poll more frequently, or create more detailed graphs. But more SNMP data doesn’t equal better traffic visibility—it just gives you more ways to see the same aggregate statistics.

Another misconception is that packet captures (PCAP) are the solution. While packet captures provide complete visibility, they’re impractical for continuous monitoring. They generate massive amounts of data, require significant storage, and are difficult to analyze at scale. Packet captures are great for deep-dive troubleshooting, but terrible for ongoing bandwidth analysis.

Why Typical Solutions Fail

The typical response to bandwidth problems without proper visibility is reactive and inefficient:

  • Blocking traffic blindly: Administrators start blocking ports or applications to see what reduces utilization. This disrupts legitimate business traffic and rarely identifies the actual problem.
  • Upgrading bandwidth: Organizations throw money at the problem by upgrading circuits without understanding if bandwidth is actually the issue or if it’s being wasted by unnecessary traffic.
  • Manual log analysis: Teams spend hours correlating firewall logs, proxy logs, and device logs trying to piece together what’s happening. This is time-consuming and often inconclusive.

The fundamental issue is that you’re trying to solve a traffic analysis problem with a device health monitoring tool. That’s why you need a different approach.

The Solution: Combine SNMP with NetFlow for Complete Visibility

The solution isn’t to replace SNMP—it’s to complement it with NetFlow (or similar flow protocols like sFlow, IPFIX, or jFlow). This combination gives you both device health monitoring and detailed traffic analysis.

Overview of Approach:

  • Keep SNMP for device health and interface utilization monitoring (the “what” and “where”)
  • Add NetFlow for traffic flow analysis (the “who,” “why,” and “which applications”)
  • Integrate both into a unified monitoring platform for correlation

What You’ll Need:

  • Network devices that support NetFlow export (most modern routers and switches)
  • A NetFlow collector and analysis tool
  • Monitoring platform that supports both SNMP and NetFlow (like PRTG Network Monitor)
  • 2-4 hours for initial setup

Time Required: 2-4 hours for setup, immediate results once deployed

Step 1: Verify Your SNMP Monitoring Foundation

Before adding NetFlow, ensure your SNMP monitoring is properly configured. You need solid baseline monitoring to identify when problems occur.

Detailed Instructions:

  • Confirm SNMP is enabled on all critical network devices (routers, switches, firewalls)
  • Verify you’re monitoring interface utilization on all critical links
  • Set appropriate alert thresholds (typically 80% utilization for warnings, 90% for critical)
  • Ensure polling intervals are appropriate (1-2 minutes for critical devices)

Why This Step Matters: SNMP alerts will trigger your investigation. NetFlow will help you diagnose the cause. Without reliable SNMP alerting, you won’t know when to look at NetFlow data.

Common Mistakes:

  • Skipping this step and jumping straight to NetFlow (you need both)
  • Using default community strings like “public” (security risk)
  • Not setting up proper alerting (defeats the purpose of monitoring)

Example: A financial services company discovered their SNMP monitoring was polling every 10 minutes, which meant they were missing short-duration bandwidth spikes. Reducing polling to 2 minutes revealed patterns they’d been missing for months.

Step 2: Enable NetFlow on Strategic Network Segments

Don’t enable NetFlow everywhere—focus on locations where traffic visibility provides maximum value.

Detailed Instructions:

  1. Start with your internet gateway router. This is the single most valuable location for NetFlow because it shows all traffic entering and leaving your network.
  2. Configure NetFlow export. Access your router’s configuration and enable NetFlow (or IPFIX/sFlow depending on vendor). Point the export to your NetFlow collector’s IP address and port (typically UDP 2055 or 9995).
  3. Consider sampling for high-traffic devices. If your internet gateway handles more than 1 Gbps of traffic, start with 1:100 sampling to reduce device CPU impact. You can adjust later based on performance.
  4. Verify flow export. Check your NetFlow collector to confirm it’s receiving flows from the device.

Why This Step Matters: NetFlow provides the missing piece—visibility into individual traffic flows. You’ll see source IPs, destination IPs, ports, protocols, and byte counts for every conversation on your network.

Common Mistakes:

  • Enabling NetFlow on every device (generates too much data and wastes resources)
  • Not planning for storage requirements (flow data can consume gigabytes per day)
  • Forgetting to configure firewall rules to allow flow export to reach the collector

Example: A healthcare organization enabled NetFlow on their internet gateway and immediately discovered that 35% of their bandwidth was consumed by a single server running unauthorized BitTorrent traffic. The issue had existed for months but was invisible to SNMP monitoring.

Step 3: Deploy a NetFlow Collector and Analysis Tool

NetFlow data is useless without a tool to collect, store, and analyze it.

Detailed Instructions:

  1. Choose a NetFlow collector. Select a tool that integrates with your existing SNMP monitoring. Unified platforms like PRTG, SolarWinds, or ManageEngine provide both SNMP and NetFlow in a single interface.
  2. Configure storage and retention. Plan for 1-5 GB of flow data per day per device (varies based on traffic volume). Set retention policies—typically 7-30 days for detailed flows, longer for summarized data.
  3. Create integrated dashboards. Build views that show SNMP interface utilization alongside NetFlow top talkers and applications. This correlation is where the real value emerges.
  4. Set up NetFlow-based alerts. Configure alerts for unusual traffic patterns—new top talkers consuming >20% bandwidth, unexpected protocols, or traffic to suspicious destinations.

Why This Step Matters: The integration between SNMP and NetFlow is what makes this solution powerful. When SNMP alerts you to high utilization, you should be able to click through to NetFlow data with a single click.

Common Mistakes:

  • Using separate tools for SNMP and NetFlow (makes correlation difficult)
  • Not configuring adequate storage (running out of space means losing historical data)
  • Collecting flows but never actually analyzing them

Step 4: Establish Your Troubleshooting Workflow

Create a standard process for investigating bandwidth issues using your combined SNMP and NetFlow data.

Detailed Instructions:

  1. SNMP alerts you to the problem. You receive an alert that Interface GigabitEthernet0/1 is at 95% utilization.
  2. Check NetFlow for that interface. Open your monitoring dashboard and view the top talkers for that specific interface. You’ll immediately see which IPs are consuming the most bandwidth.
  3. Drill down into applications. Look at the top applications and protocols. Is it legitimate business traffic (Microsoft Teams, Salesforce) or something unexpected (streaming video, file sharing)?
  4. Identify the source. Use the source IP addresses to determine which users or devices are responsible. Cross-reference with your DHCP or IP address management system.
  5. Take action. Based on what you find, you can block unauthorized traffic, implement QoS policies to prioritize business applications, or contact users about inappropriate usage.

Why This Step Matters: A defined workflow ensures your team uses the tools consistently and efficiently. Without a process, people fall back to old troubleshooting habits.

Example: A manufacturing company reduced their average troubleshooting time from 3.5 hours to 20 minutes by implementing this workflow. The key was having SNMP and NetFlow data integrated in a single dashboard, eliminating the need to jump between tools.

Step 5: Use the Data Proactively

Once you have visibility, shift from reactive troubleshooting to proactive management.

Detailed Instructions:

  1. Review NetFlow data weekly. Look for trends in application usage, top talkers, and traffic patterns. Identify bandwidth-consuming applications before they cause problems.
  2. Implement QoS policies. Use NetFlow data to identify business-critical applications and configure Quality of Service policies to prioritize them during congestion.
  3. Plan capacity based on actual usage. Use historical NetFlow data to understand real bandwidth requirements. When planning circuit upgrades, you’ll know exactly what capacity you need and why.
  4. Detect security threats. Monitor for unusual traffic patterns—unexpected protocols, connections to suspicious destinations, or sudden traffic spikes that could indicate compromised systems.

Why This Step Matters: The real value of combining SNMP and NetFlow isn’t just faster troubleshooting—it’s preventing problems before they impact users.

Alternative Solutions

While combining SNMP and NetFlow is the most effective approach, there are alternatives depending on your specific situation.

Packet Capture (PCAP) for Deep Analysis

When to use: When you need complete visibility into packet contents for security investigations or complex troubleshooting.

Pros: Complete visibility, captures all packet details
Cons: Generates massive data volumes, requires significant storage, difficult to analyze at scale, not practical for continuous monitoring

Use case: Use packet captures for targeted deep-dive investigations, not for ongoing bandwidth monitoring.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools

When to use: When you need to understand application performance from the user perspective, not just network traffic.

Pros: Provides end-user experience metrics, identifies application-specific issues
Cons: Requires agents on endpoints, doesn’t provide network-wide visibility, expensive for large deployments

Use case: Complement network monitoring with APM for business-critical applications.

Comparison to Main Solution: NetFlow provides network-wide visibility with minimal overhead and cost. Packet captures and APM tools serve specific use cases but aren’t replacements for continuous traffic analysis.

How to Avoid This Problem

Once you’ve implemented the solution, follow these best practices to maintain visibility and prevent future bandwidth mysteries.

Proactive Measures:

  • Review top talkers and applications weekly to spot trends before they become problems
  • Set up alerts for unusual traffic patterns (new top talkers, unexpected protocols)
  • Document your normal traffic baselines so you can quickly identify anomalies
  • Implement QoS policies based on NetFlow data to prioritize business-critical traffic

Best Practices:

  • Keep NetFlow retention at 30 days minimum for trend analysis
  • Review and update your troubleshooting workflow quarterly
  • Train all network team members on how to read and analyze NetFlow data
  • Use bandwidth monitoring strategies to stay ahead of capacity issues

Monitoring and Maintenance:

  • Check NetFlow collector health weekly to ensure flows are being received
  • Review storage usage monthly and adjust retention if needed
  • Validate that SNMP and NetFlow data are properly correlated in your dashboards
  • Update NetFlow configurations when adding new network devices

You’ve Got This

Bandwidth problems don’t have to be mysteries that consume hours of troubleshooting time. By combining SNMP’s device health monitoring with NetFlow’s traffic analysis capabilities, you gain complete visibility into both what’s happening on your network and why it’s happening.

Summary of Solution:

  1. Maintain solid SNMP monitoring for device health and alerting
  2. Add NetFlow to strategic network segments for traffic visibility
  3. Integrate both into a unified monitoring platform
  4. Establish a standard troubleshooting workflow
  5. Use the data proactively to prevent problems

Expected Results:

  • 60-80% reduction in troubleshooting time for bandwidth issues
  • Immediate identification of bandwidth-consuming applications and users
  • Proactive capacity planning based on actual usage data
  • Better security through detection of unusual traffic patterns

Next Steps:
Start with your internet gateway. Enable NetFlow, point it to a collector, and spend a week just observing the data. You’ll be amazed at what you discover about your network traffic. Then expand to other critical segments and build out your integrated monitoring strategy.

For more detailed guidance on implementing effective network monitoring, check out our guide on network monitoring best practices. And if you’re ready to deploy a unified SNMP and NetFlow monitoring solution, explore how PRTG Network Monitor can provide both capabilities in a single, integrated platform.